FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem has expressed his support for the introduction of permanent stewards in Formula 1. However, he raised concerns regarding the financing of such a system. The idea comes amidst ongoing debates over the consistency of decisions made by stewards throughout the season.
Debate Over Steward Consistency
The debate about steward consistency has been reignited following several contentious decisions this year. These have led to increased calls for a more standardised approach. Drivers and teams have expressed frustration over perceived inconsistencies, questioning whether having different stewards at each event contributes to this issue.
George Russell Calls for Change
George Russell, a prominent voice in the paddock and a director of the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association (GPDA), has suggested a need to rethink the current stewarding structure. He advocates for moving away from the rotating system of volunteers towards establishing permanent roles.
The Challenge of Funding Permanent Stewards
While supportive of the concept in principle, Ben Sulayem points out the significant challenge of financing a professional stewarding body. The sport would need to assess who bears the cost for implementing such a system. He highlights this as the chief obstacle to any potential changes.
Ben Sulayem remarked, “There is always a financial aspect to consider. Who will be responsible for funding these permanent roles? The FIA, teams, or another entity?”
Potential Impact on Formula 1
The introduction of permanent stewards could lead to more consistent decision-making, ensuring fair play and enhancing the integrity of the sport. However, the question of who pays remains at the forefront of discussions. Any changes would need to balance these logistical considerations with the desired outcomes.
Industry Opinions and Future Discussions
The conversation around stewarding is far from over, with various stakeholders in the sport weighing in. Some suggest that the professionalisation of stewards is inevitable if Formula 1 is to continue its growth and uphold fairness.
As talks progress, it remains to be seen how Formula 1 and the FIA will address these issues, and what compromises might be reached. The matter is likely to be a topic of further debate in upcoming meetings and within the broader motorsport community.
For now, Formula 1 must continue with the existing system, while considering potential changes in the future that could enhance the sport’s credibility and fairness.
