Mohammed Ben Sulayem, the FIA President, has recently been thrust into controversy following a stern letter from the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association (GPDA). At a critical juncture leading up to the next election cycle, Ben Sulayem finds himself navigating contentious waters.
A Challenging Tenure
Since assuming his role as FIA President, Ben Sulayem’s leadership has been marked by contentious decisions. Notably, his focus on banning jewellery and enforcing fireproof underwear has raised eyebrows. He also faced legal caution from Liberty Media over remarks on F1’s valuation. Now, his recent emphasis on swearing has attracted criticism from the GPDA.
The GPDA’s Stern Message
The GPDA expressed its concerns through a statement criticising Ben Sulayem’s tone and approach. As the statement reads, “We urge the FIA president to also consider his own tone and language when talking to our member drivers, or indeed about them, whether in a public forum or otherwise.” The drivers also pointed out the triviality of some mandates, including jewellery and underwear regulations.
Shared Discontent Among Drivers
What makes this incident noteworthy is the unified stance of the drivers within the GPDA. Typically, drivers seldom align on issues outside of safety. However, this collective criticism of Ben Sulayem signals a pervasive discontent with his leadership style. This consensus underscores a significant concern within the racing community as Ben Sulayem aims to bolster his reputation.
Ben Sulayem’s challenges are compounded by his pre-election promises. During an interview with Autosport before his election in 2021, he presented plans that seemed progressive and unifying. However, the recent backlash questions the execution of these plans.
A Call for Reflection and Change
Ben Sulayem’s approach, characterised by some as heavy-handed, appears to be driving a wedge between the FIA’s leadership and the drivers. This schism lends urgency to reevaluating strategies and fostering a more collaborative environment.
The GPDA’s letter serves not only as a critique but as an opportunity for Ben Sulayem to reassess and potentially reshape his approach to governance. As the election year looms, it is imperative for Ben Sulayem to heed the call for improved discourse and mutual respect amongst stakeholders.
Whether Ben Sulayem will adjust his methods remains to be seen. However, the current climate calls for a leader who listens to the athletes’ voices, recognising their integral role in the sport’s ecosystem.
